Over fifty percent of the expense for a new DC Fast Charger goes towards a singular safety circuit. Specialists indicate this might soon evolve.
- Building DC fast chargers can be extremely expensive.
- Approximately 60% of that expense goes towards a circuit intended to protect individuals from electric shock during the charging process.
- It might be possible to find a less expensive yet equally safe method to achieve this, which could also enhance the reliability of electric vehicle charging stations.
Have you ever pondered why DC fast chargers are so costly to construct? For instance, a solitary 300-kilowatt Level 3 charger costs quite a bit.
one
parking at a public DC fast charger can exceed $100,000. This expense is among the factors contributing to the sluggish development of charging infrastructure, which has largely depended on governmental funding.
a la
federal funding
.
Let’s discuss what lies within that charger. If we were to dismantle it, we would discover around $90,000 worth of electronic components designed to transfer power from the electrical grid directly to your electric vehicle’s battery. The surprising part? Approximately 60% of this expense covers just one safety mechanism ensuring nothing malfunctions and turns you into toast inadvertently. This indicates over half the price of an EV charger is dedicated solely to protecting your life.
$54,000 in Shock Protection: Why It Matters
The system is referred to as an isolation link. According to
IEEE Spectrum
The estimated cost for this protective measure is around $54,000. If you extrapolate that to cover an entire 8-stall charging area, over $430,000 would be allocated solely to safety gear. This is how it operates:
Gas pumps use mechanical mechanisms for regulating the flow of fuel into vehicles. In contrast, electric vehicle chargers handle high-voltage electrical currents.
frequently at 800 volts or higher
Electricity takes the easy way out; it will follow the quickest route to the ground. If something goes awry with this immense force, it could electrocute you immediately. That’s precisely why ensuring safety is crucial.
An isolation link achieves a safety principle known as
galvanic isolation
This involves isolating two distinct circuits within an individual electrical setup to ensure that current cannot pass between them. For electric vehicle charging stations, this entails disconnecting the electrical connection between the charger’s power supply and the vehicle. Consequently, should a malfunction arise, the energy will have no pathway except to return to the grid.
Here’s how
IEEE
explains it:
Imagine an electric vehicle’s battery starts leaking. Since the leaked substance conducts electricity, it can create a pathway for electrical flow between the battery system and the car frame. Should the grounding connection fail, and assuming there is no insulation, the car’s structure might attain a high voltage level. Consequently, anyone who touches the vehicle when grounded could suffer a severe electric shock. However, with proper insulation measures in place, this risk vanishes as there won’t be any conducting route allowing current to travel from the power grid into the automobile body.
To make isolation happen, every DCFC uses a transformer in its power conversion hardware—that’s the circuit that converts AC to DC power, and vice versa. These high-frequency transformers are capable of moving kilowatts of electricity at high voltages and provide a crucial building block in a circuit without creating a direct path between the grid and your car. It’s a complicated, expensive system, but without it, a charging mishap could turn your Tesla into a Tesla coil.
More Affordable Charging Options Are Not As Easy as They Seem
Researchers and engineers know that charging infrastructure is too expensive. These experts are looking into ways to cut costs without compromising safety. But some of those ideas come with serious caveats and would mean rewriting how every modern EV charges.
One suggestion is to eliminate the isolation connection in the charger and instead mandate that electric vehicles incorporate their own isolation system within the vehicle’s onboard charger. Given that onboard chargers in automobiles manage power conversion, these systems are inherently galvanically isolated. Nonetheless, many of them typically only accommodate power conversion rates suitable for Level 2 charging speeds; Tesla being an exception, for instance.
can handle up to 48 amps in most of its versions
).
This might significantly reduce the expense of the chargers, yet all cars are not constructed identically.
Today’s electric vehicles come with various charging systems, and placing the burden on manufacturers would necessitate a new universal standard that currently does not exist. As such, earlier models of EVs might get sidelined. Additionally, there’s the concern about relying on carmakers to embrace this new universal standard and execute it securely. After all, experience has shown us that they are entirely consistent when it comes to policing themselves.
examining cases like yours, Volkswagen’s Dieselgate, General Motors’ ignition switch issue, and Takata’s airbag recalls
).
Next comes the significant issue of expense. We mustn’t overlook that the price tag attached to this system does not vanish into thin air. Relocating the hardware to the vehicle merely shifts the cost from the charging station to the automobile itself. To put it plainly, it’s an immediate non-starter.
The Argument for Abandoning Solitude
This completes the cycle: safety features render DC fast chargers extremely costly. The higher costs lead to delayed installations and may restrict the number of charging spots at each location. When it comes to solutions, some specialists advocate eliminating isolation connectors in charge points entirely.
Initially, this concept may appear risky. However, IEEE suggests another approach: rather than separating the circuits, why not incorporate an additional grounding system? Consider this: the secondary ground wouldn’t just provide a backup safeguard; it could also identify a faulty ground connection and promptly halt the charging process upon detection. In essence, this method theoretically removes the necessity for expensive isolation components. Furthermore, it enhances overall charger dependability by streamlining the power electronics within the charger, thereby reducing one significant potential source of malfunction.
Next is another concern that needs addressing: discrepancies in voltage levels.
Should the line voltage from the charger surpass that of the vehicle’s battery momentarily, an unchecked flow of current might lead to damage of the car components. According to IEEE, addressing this issue involves employing a buck regulator—a device designed to lower the voltage provided by the power supply securely. The piece further indicates that although this introduces another level of intricacy into the charging system, incorporating such a buck regulator with comparable capacity would only increase costs by approximately 10%, as opposed to utilizing an isolation link.
Will This Actually Happen?
Maybe, but not anytime soon.
The rationale for eliminating galvanic isolation appears logical in theory.
original Tesla Roadster
used non-galvanically isolated charging,
but
It was not capable of utilizing DC Fast Charging either. Contemporary DC Fast Chargers deliver substantial currents into today’s electric vehicles’ batteries and necessitate additional safety features (thus requiring an isolation link). However, this would only apply if—or that’s a significant condition—if such charging capabilities were included.
if
—The industry not only has the potential to create a dependable and secure method for achieving this, but it could also revolutionize the electric vehicle charging landscape.
Through a pragmatic perspective, the global community is currently grappling with providing adequate public charging solutions, and no one is eager to risk being at the forefront of safety concerns. Both charging providers, automotive manufacturers, and regulatory bodies require an absolute assurance that any non-isolated system will match the current standards of charger safety. Assuming this condition were met, implementing these changes could still take several years—particularly considering how critical safety measures must be prioritized in this process.
For now, anticipate that new electric vehicle chargers will continue to be quite expensive. Since when it comes to ensuring your safety from electrical hazards, the industry is not ready to compromise—just yet.
More EV Charging News
- Electrify America’s 2024 Statistics Show How Rapidly the Electric Vehicle Market Is Growing
- Public Electric Vehicle Charging Was Already Deteriorating. Then Trump Eliminated Federal Financing
- Trump’s Removal of EV Chargers Might Cost Taxpayers More Than $1 Billion
- The Federal Electric Vehicle Charger Initiative Might Be Terminated. It Had Only Started Yielding Results.
