On Wednesday, a federal appeals court temporarily halted an injunction issued by U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan. This injunction had required Elon Musk and the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) to submit documents and respond to queries regarding their initiatives aimed at reducing government overhead.
A trio of judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit has issued a stay on Judge Chutkan’s order, indicating that the lower-court judge needs to first address the Trump administration’s request to have the case dismissed prior to permitting any discovery proceedings. This does not constitute a definitive decision regarding whether DOGE will ultimately be required to submit the documents in question.
Shortly following the panel’s decision, Judge Chutkan rescinded a status hearing that was set for Thursday.
Chutkan’s ruling allowing for discovery set a precedent as it was the initial instance where a judge mandated Musk to submit documents in response to a lawsuit challenging his and DOGE’s initiatives aimed at reducing the size of the federal government and cutting expenses.
She
said her order
was intended to enable the recognition of DOGE staff members and “the scope of DOGE’s and Musk’s authority.”
A lawsuit filed by a group of states, spearheaded by New Mexico, has sought information regarding DOGE. The coalition argues that Musk’s significant leadership position with DOGE is unconstitutional because he hasn’t been approved by the Senate. Their aim is to prevent DOGE from gaining access to seven different federal agencies.
Although the wealthy technology entrepreneur is reportedly spearheading extensive cost-reduction initiatives for DOGE, the White House insists that Musk isn’t officially affiliated with DOGE; he acts merely as a high-level advisor to the president.
Energetic and appointed by former President Biden, Chutkan was overseeing the federal criminal case related to election subversion against President Trump.
previously declined to grant
The plea from the 14 Democratic state attorneys general for a temporary restraining order after determining they hadn’t demonstrated the required evidence of irreparable damage.
However, in a footnote,
the judge suggested
The Justice Department might have exaggerated some facts in their legal documents about DOGE’s authority concerning employee matters. She pointed out to the government its obligation to “provide accurate information to the court.”
DOGE has faced numerous legal challenges due to its swift attempts to place staff members within federal agencies, all aimed at reducing government expenditures by trillions of dollars.
The states led by Democrats aim to prevent Musk and individuals associated with DOGE from obtaining sensitive information housed within several federal agencies including the Office of Personnel Management, the Department of Education, the Department of Labor, the Department of Health and Human Services, the Department of Energy, the Department of Transportation, and the Department of Commerce.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This content must not be republished, distributed, aired, or altered without permission.
To get the most recent updates on news, weather, sports, and live videos, go to .
